This topic relates to the proposal to build new houses to the south of Buckden
Background
In April of this year, just before the Easter holiday, Gladman Developments Ltd submitted to Huntingdon District Council (HDC) a planning application for ‘up to 180 dwellings on land west of Lucks Lane, Buckden’. In this application they have said that up to 40% of the dwellings will be affordable housing. The planning application can be viewed on the HDC website
here
. The planning documents are, in the main, marked as ‘General Document Public Access’ and are on the later pages.
The land in question is largely the field bordering the A1 between Buckden and Stirtloe Lane. Access to this site will be via Lucks Lane.
Gladman circulated a ‘Consultation’ leaflet to a few houses directly affected by the development and HDC sent letters to 61 houses advising them of the application.
A small group of concerned residents immediately called a meeting for Buckden residents, held at the Community Centre, and in spite of the very short notice over 170 people attended the meeting. The overriding view expressed was opposition to the proposed development.
A group of residents agreed to form an action group to try to co-ordinate objections to the proposal and the Protect Buckden’s Future group was established.
At the time of writing over 180 comments have been submitted to HDC the vast majority objecting to the proposal. These can be viewed on the HDC website using the above link and
here
.
You can also view entries made on this web site by clicking
here
Considering that approximately only 60 houses received notification of the proposal this shows the depth of concern felt in the village.
Gladman. Who are they?
Gladman are based in Cheshire and seek to ‘obtain residential planning consents on edge of town greenfield sites and use our expertise and financial resources to proactively promote the sites and secure planning permission’.
They do this by locating such sites where they feel the local housing plans are weak or out-of-date and then approach the local land owners, or the land owners approach them, to put forward their plans. Recent relaxation of planning regulations has made their objective much easier to achieve.
They agree with the land owners a fee for the purchase of the land, subject to receiving planning permission, and then resell that land to housing developers at a profit. Usually all costs are borne by Gladman – the land owners lose nothing if permission is not granted. Of course, land with housing permission is far more valuable than without it.
An interesting press article on Gladman can be seen
here
.
We believe that Gladman have been working on the Buckden project for at least two years. They employ highly qualified, professional staff and consultants. They have invested considerable time, resources and money to reach this stage. To proceed with the application they must feel confident of success.
Gladman are NOT a company to be underestimated. They are thorough and persistent. But, as history shows, they CAN be defeated.
Does it affect you?
In a word, ‘yes’. Apart from the increased traffic and strain on our local services which are all detailed in objector’s comments on the HDC, and this, website, there are other less obvious issues.
Gladman anticipate that it will take 5-6 years to build the development. During that time HGV’s delivering materials and contractor’s vehicles will need to access the site. This will all be via Mayfield and Lucks Lane. There is no possibility of the Highways Authorities allowing access via the A1 and Stirtloe Lane. This would be accidents waiting to happen. As we all know building works tend to start and finish early. Therefore this traffic will be using the roads whilst our children are going to and from school and when we are trying to get to work.
Also, this traffic will significantly increase the wear and tear on Mayfield and Lucks Lane which are already in a poor state. Who will pay for the repairs to these roads? We can assume it will not be Gladman and therefore it will fall to the local highways authority. The authority’s accounts are already stretched due to funding cutbacks and the contribution they have to make to the development of the A14. So this cost will eventually fall to us by increased council tax bills.
In Gladman’s Consulation document they recognise that the local primary school is near capacity and state ‘
a contribution will be paid to the local education authority to ensure that sufficient school places are made available’. In the planning application they are more circumspect and state ‘
The capacity of local schools and other facilities will be investigated and, where appropriate, contributions to effectively mitigate the impacts of the proposal will be provided’.
In fact for developments of less than 200 dwellings there is no obligation on the developer to provide any funding and Gladman are well aware of this. We understand that Gladman are not very forthcoming with handing out ‘contributions’; why should they – it reduces their profits!
In fact the obligation falls on to the local authorities and therefore, ultimately, on us as council taxpayers.
Affordable Housing. Is it?
Most peoples’ definition of affordable housing is either council housing, housing association property or shared equity. Most people welcome affordable housing in that it will allow our children to stay in the village instead of moving somewhere cheaper or it will bring in new families who will bring new life to the village.
Gladman see it somewhat differently. They interpret it as defined by changes to legislation which are explained in this
press article
.
In effect affordable housing on this development will cost upward of £250,000. Can our children and young families afford such prices?
What can you do?
There are two ways in which this application can be defeated.
The first is to raise objections which counter the claims made by Gladman. These are not difficult to find but, as said earlier, Gladman have been preparing this for two years and will have their counter arguments already prepared.
The second is by sheer weight of numbers. It would be a very brave planning inspector who is prepared to fly in the face of hundreds, if not thousands, of objectors.
Therefore if you feel strongly about this please make your objections to HDC. This can be done by letter to Mr. Gavin Sylvester, Hunts DC, Pathfinder House, St. Mary’s Street, Huntingdon, PE29 3TN or by e-mail to
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or by registering on the HDC web site and posting your objection there.
Please also write to your local councillors and MP. These are our elected representatives and they should be in no doubt as to which path we expect them to follow. Their future jobs may depend on it!
It is not too late. We have until at least the 20th June 2016 to make our objections and the more that are made the better our opinions will be recognised.
We believe that Gladman may be using this application as a ‘test case’. If they succeed with this application no settlement in Huntingdonshire and the surrounding countryside will be safe from their attentions. Consequently if you know anyone in such a place please inform them of this issue and ask them add their objections to this proposal.
If you have any comments or questions please register and post them here. Then everyone will benefit from the increased understanding of what is going on. Alternatively write to
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
We will keep this forum updated with developments so please keep watching.
Thank you for taking the time to read this article.
Protect Buckden’s Future.